Compare And Contrast Three Authors Say About Nature Of “technology`

Author NameCourse NameGuide NameMarch 9 , 2008Technology : Nature and Effects on anatomical reference mental synthesis and Behavior of OrganizationsIntroductionThe ever-changing nature of utilize science has induced m all a(prenominal) studies on the semblance between engine room and placement or placemental social building to be more specific . As engineering evolves from one aim of sophistication to a high train , it is obvious that the entire gamut of production from design , equipment , procedures , operators , supplies and actual to the surround undergoes changes . It to a fault follows naturally that such(prenominal) wide-ranging changes ar intimidate to be reflected in the face structure also . The perplexity here is - to what extent does engine room affect or regularize formation structure ? The three studies under precondition mint radically different stands on the issue . bit `The vigilance of Innovation by destroy Stalker (1961 ) asserts that changing technology and mart place conditions define the management system of some(prenominal) governing body , `The Measurement of Organization Structures by DS Pugh (1973 ) states that technology by itself has a very minimal effect on the structure of organizations , especially manufacturing organizations , barely combines with new(prenominal) contextual dimensions such as size of it , to exert a telling mildew on the organization structure Charles Perrow (1984 /1999 ) in `Normal Accidents , active with high-risk Technologies , on the other hand , contends that the present level of sophistication and complexities in technologies confirm led to a pip in which organization structures , however developed or fit they may be to the changing technological situations , are otiose to cope with or handle systems with `interac tive complexities and tight couplingIn many! another(prenominal) ways , Burns Stalker and Perrow assume that management has a very minimal role to romp in the organisation of organization structure Burns Stalker implies that technology and market conditions or the changes in them almost instinctively determine the structure of organizations i .e . organization structure changes in response to changes in technical and market situations .

Perrow takes control issue of the hands of domain and management in situations that are the result of the intricacies of technology and unexplainable to the intellect of gay beings . Pugh however attri simplyes senior management with free lance capacitance to alter the structure of an organization by as very much as the combined effects of all other contextual dimensions of the organization itselfBurns Stalker and Perrow describe extreme situations . Pugh adopts a more rational and holistic approach . All organizations impart be affected by technology and the changes in technology , but technology by itself could hardly lead to spontaneous shaping organization structure . It is management that will have to apprehend the technology , its changes and the related implications and mould the organization to resolve and conform effectively to changing environments . The human management calculate has to play a decisive and deliberate role in delimitate and implementing different kinds of organization structure for different types of technology situations winning into consideration not only the technological position but also all other factors that could affect the organization structureThe optimal or ideal organizati on structure for any technology situation could in al! l possibilities not be the measurement or...If you want to get a full essay, set out it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay